Vocabulary Acquisition in Young EFL Learners: A Thematic Review of Strategies, Media, and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.26513Keywords:
vocabulary acquisition, young EFL learners, learning strategies, instructional media, thematic literature reviewAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of research on vocabulary learning among Young EFL learners. Through detailed thematic analysis, we systematically reviewed eleven (published between 2018 and 2025) peer-reviewed articles. We searched the leading academic databases using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies related to young learners, vocabulary teaching and learning, and empirical work. Three recurring themes emerged from the findings: methods of instruction, learning materials and tools, and student performance. Findings indicate that interactive strategies, such as storytelling, realia, game-based activities, and tech-based tools (e.g., Quizizz and Wordwall), enhance student vocabulary learning, retention, and motivation. Hybrid models of traditional instruction blended with technology-based learning also support short-term gains and long-term retention when the content is both culturally relevant and developmentally appropriate. The thematic synthesis has implications for practitioners and policymakers in education who seek empirically supported principles to inform the improvement of vocabulary teaching in young EFL contexts.
References
Aedo, P., & Millafilo, C. (2022). Increasing vocabulary acquisition and retention in EFL young learners through the use of multimodal texts (memes). Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 24(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.18312
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brilianti, A. E., & Sugirin, S. (2024). Boosting young EFL learners' English vocabulary acquisition by utilizing puppet pictures as storytelling media. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v9i2.21622
Hidayatullah, A. S., Sudirman, A., Ardhian, T., Vijayanti, D., Sari, S. R., & Sari, A. L. L. (2025). Investigating vocabulary acquisition among young learners through contemporary and traditional games in interactive EFL settings. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.47709/dst.v5i1.6091
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164
Krashen, S. (1992). The Input Hypothesis: An Update. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language Pedagogy: The State of the Art (pp. 409-431). Georgetown University Press. https://books.google.com.vn/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GzgWsZDlVo0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA409&dq=Krashen,+S.+(1992).+The+input+hypothesis:+An+update.+Linguistics+and+language+pedagogy:+The+state+of+the+art,+12(3),+409-431.&ots=pDLOgeOYhl&sig=zfGyVyDS2JI19uBZgJ0920u9W2s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Linda, A., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Vocabulary acquisition style in the ESL classroom: A survey on the use of vocabulary learning strategies by the primary 3 learners. Creative Education, 11(10), 1973. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.1110144
MacBlain, S. (2021). Learning theories for early years practice. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282231
Morocho, M. H. A., Medina, G. M. P., & Jaramillo, M. A. M. (2025). Wordwall platform to foster new vocabulary acquisition in young learners with A2 level: Plataforma Wordwall para fomentar la adquisición de nuevo vocabulario en jóvenes estudiantes con nivel A2. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(1), 1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i1.3442
Nation, P. (2019). The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15–29). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586
Nguyen, H. A. (2024). Harnessing AI-Based Tools for Enhancing English Speaking Proficiency: Impacts, Challenges, and Long-Term Engagement. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.24122
Nguyen, H. A. (2025). MA Students’ Perceptions and Experiences with the Gemini App in English Language Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study at Van Lang University, Vietnam. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25221
Nguyen, T. Y., Thach, L. S., & Nguyen, P. N. T. (2025). Effects of using Quizizz on vocabulary acquisition of Vietnamese EFL young learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(7), 2150–2162. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1507.07
Rahmayani, F. A. (2022). Vocabulary acquisition on young learners through the use of realia media. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 3(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v3i2.15998
Silva, B., & Otwinowska, A. (2018). Vocabulary acquisition and young learners: Different tasks, similar involvement loads. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(2), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0097
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Hoang Anh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of Language Instruction (ijli) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijli are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.





