A Comprehensive Review of Change-of-State Constructions across Languages with a Focus on English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24343Keywords:
Change-of-State, Syntax, Construction Grammar, English, Cross-LinguisticAbstract
Change-of-State (COS) constructions reveal essential aspects of language, bridging syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Current research trends have highlighted gaps in understanding cross-linguistic patterns within COS constructions. This study addresses these gaps by investigating how COS constructions are encoded in English compared to Mandarin, Spanish, Hindi, and Russian, focusing on morphosyntactic structures and argument roles. The study involved analyzing documented linguistic data, employing Construction Grammar and thematic role frameworks to assess verb morphology, syntax, and argument structure. Key findings reveal both universal tendencies and language-specific differences in expressing state changes. These results enhance the theoretical framework for understanding language variability in COS expressions. This research underscores the significance of COS constructions in linguistic typology and proposes directions for further investigation, especially in underrepresented languages and alternative syntactic frameworks.
References
Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 147-190). John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber
Bochnak, M. R., & Matthewson, L. (Eds.). (2018). Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840579
Dik, S. C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar: Part 1: The structure of the clause. Mouton de Gruyter.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Huang, C.-T. J. (1997). On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 3, 45-89.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. MIT Press.
Kayne, R. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Michaelis, L. A., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). The exclamative sentence type in English. In Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 375-389). Stanford University Press.
Pham, N. T. L. (2024). A Comparative Study of Cultural Categories in American English and Vietnamese Shop Signs. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24421
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811319
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1): Concept structuring systems. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
Vo, T. Q. T. (2022). Comparing Existential Sentences in Chinese, English and Vietnamese from the Perspective of Linguistic Typology. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(3), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222317
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tran Quang Hai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of Language Instruction (ijli) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijli are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
